Rev.Espiritu.net — Rex Espiritu’s blog for Leadership.NewCastleFPC.org

March 9, 2008

What Presbyterians Believe: Elders as spiritual leaders

Filed under: Leadership, PCUSA, Polity, Reformed — rexespiritu @ 6:52 pm

Today the PC(USA) and other mainline congregations stand at a crossroads.  Throughout the church and society there is a desire for radically committed and faithful leadershipPeople are searching for congregations with leaders who both instruct and inspire, and who are willing to lead by exampleWhen people joyfully engage in the work of ministry, the body of Christ is strengthened and the church matures to take on the character of ChristThe mission that Christ has set before elders requires a constant process of dying to the old self and renewal by the Holy Spirit.

Making the church's witness relevant to today's Presbyterians
PC(USA) Seal
 
 

                 
 

What Presbyterians Believe          

   

March 2008

 
 

Elders as spiritual leaders

Send a letter to the editor

By Stephany Jackson and Tammy Wiens

Illustration of people seated around a table with a book.
Illustration by Pat Hilliard

Patti Kauffman said “yes” to the call to serve as an elder because she thought her skills in administration would be an asset to her church — Beth Salem Presbyterian in Columbus, Ga.

“I thought that all I had to do was take notes, type up the minutes and send them to the presbytery office,” she says. “I knew that we had some challenges before us, but I had no idea that the presbytery was considering closing the church.”

The truth of the matter was, the church had no lights, the men’s bathroom was inoperative and the roof was in need of repair. Members of Beth Salem had said goodbye to their pastor because they could no longer afford his salary, and they were six months behind on mortgage payments. The situation looked hopeless, but the members of Beth Salem refused to give up. They looked to the session for direction.

Kauffman soon realized that administrative skills alone were not going to be enough. As clerk of session, she began calling the other elders together for regular prayer and Bible study.

“We all knew that we would have to do more than we felt capable of doing,” she says, “and the only way we were going to survive was to rely totally on God.

“We asked God to give us a mission and God answered our prayers,” she continues. “The presbytery has reinvested in our ministry. We have formed mission partnerships throughout the community. A new sense of energy has been generated in the congregation. The lights are back on, the roof is fixed and the bathroom has been repaired.”

With God’s help, Kauffman says, she has even preached twice — “something I never thought I would do.”

More than budgets, buildings

Like Kauffman, many Presbyterians say “yes” to becoming an elder, thinking it means hammering out a budget once a year, attending a few meetings, counting the offering and making sure the church gets locked up after everyone leaves. The call to serve as elder, however, is a call to serve the spiritual as well as administrative needs of God’s people.

It’s a call to build up the body of Christ, which means much more than planning for building repairs or making budget adjustments. It means ensuring that the members of the body have the opportunity to be engaged in the type of ministry and mission that will help them achieve spiritual maturity.

Elders are called to be spiritual leaders, strengthening and nurturing the faith and life of the congregation committed to their charge. In the Constitution of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) elders are instructed to engage members in the mission of the church and to provide opportunities for evangelism, pastoral care, worship, education and stewardship (Book of Order, G-10.0100). Consider the spiritual vitality that might blossom within congregations if elders would give as much time and attention to providing models for discipleship and evangelism as they give to governance and discipline.

Today the PC(USA) and other mainline congregations stand at a crossroads. Throughout the church and society there is a desire for radically committed and faithful leadership. People are searching for congregations with leaders who both instruct and inspire, and who are willing to lead by example.

Elders lead by example as they regularly attend Bible study, Sunday school or weekly prayer services. They should be equipped to interpret and support the church’s vision. When the need for additional training arises, the elders should be the first to receive it in order to provide new leadership.

Elders in the Bible

The Bible portrays various forms of church government, or polity, among the earliest Christians. There are virtues as well as limitations to every human form of government. While Presbyterian polity is not the only one suggested by biblical patterns, it does have strong biblical roots.

In the first five books of the Bible elders are always mentioned in connection with Moses. In Exodus 3:16–18 God directs Moses to “assemble the elders” and lay out a plan that would free the Israelites after years of bondage. Numbers 11 says elders were chosen after Moses complained to God that he needed help leading the people. The role of the elder takes various forms throughout the Old Testament. Elders are responsible for carrying out legislative and administrative functions. They also are responsible for leading the community by teaching and living out models of obedience to the law (see Exodus 19:7–8; Deuteronomy 27:1, 31:9, 32:7).

In the New Testament, God calls to leadership wise, dedicated and mature persons of faith. All members of Christ’s body, the church, are endowed with unique gifts for the purpose of service. “Elder” can refer to one who shares in corporate leadership for a cluster of Christian assemblies or churches (see Acts 20:17, 28; 1 Peter 5:1–2), or to one who has leadership over a particular congregation (see Titus 1:5–7). The term does not so much confer a title as describe a function or role in the community.

Ephesians 4:11–13 lists some of the ministries to which church leaders are called: apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers (see also 1 Corinthians 12:27–31). All of these ministries exist for the purpose of equipping the saints, members of the congregation, for Christ’s mission. When people joyfully engage in the work of ministry, the body of Christ is strengthened and the church matures to take on the character of Christ.

A Presbyterian asset

Elders are called to exercise leadership, government and discipline (Book of Order, G-60302). In the Presbyterian Church congregations share a common polity that ensures due process when disputes arise, and promotes equality for all persons. It provides a way of living together in which the concerns and suggestions of all members are taken seriously. It also helps assure members that finances are managed responsibly and mission is carried out faithfully.

This form of government is one of our denomination’s assets. It can even serve as an evangelistic strength, attracting people who have become discouraged by poorly managed religious institutions or independent congregations.

One of the questions that elders are asked before they are ordained is, “Will you be a faithful elder, watching over the people, providing for their worship, nurture and service?” The mission that Christ has set before elders requires a constant process of dying to the old self and renewal by the Holy Spirit. Only when elders engage in transformation in their own lives, can they lead others through the process.

This is not something anyone can do on his or her own. All church leaders need the love and support received through regularly engaging in spiritual practices with others. When elders take care of their own spiritual well-being, they are better equipped to model the type of spiritual growth and maturity that will inspire and enable other members of the congregation.

Stephany Jackson is associate for congregational leadership and Tammy Wiens is associate for spiritual formation in the Theology Worship and Education office of the PC(USA)’s General Assembly Council.

 
     
   
  It’s Greek to me
A glossary

In the New Testament
Both of the following terms are used interchangeably to refer to “elders”:
presbuteros—Greek word for elder, from which we derive the English word presbyter
episkopos—Greek word for overseer, from which we derive the English word episcopal, meaning bishop-led

In the PC(USA)
The role of elder has its roots in the early church, but various church traditions have come to define the role in different ways. The following terms are used in the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and some other churches in the Reformed tradition:

  • elders—elected members who are ordained to serve as the governing body (session) of a particular congregation
  • presbyters—both elders and ministers together
  • presbytery—a group of congregations in one geographic region
  • ruling elders—members of a church session
  • teaching elders—ministers
 
     
   
 

Resources for elders

The Order of Elders
This program provided by the PC(USA)’s Theology Worship and Education ministry helps Presbyterian elders find mutual support and encouragement. Members of The Order of Elders receive resources to guide their Scripture reading, prayer and study. Elders benefit from engaging in these spiritual practices along with others across the church. The Order welcomes individual members, but encourages sessions to sign on collectively so that there is a built-in local community to support their discipline. The Order of Elders is open to anyone ordained to the office of elder, whether or not he or she is currently serving on session. Those participating in The Order say it helps them take seriously their intention to nurture a regular rhythm of personal study and prayer.
Read more.

Conferences
Last year more than 300 elders attended the first national training and networking event for elders in the PC(USA) in Nashville, Tenn. Follow-up regional conferences are being planned. For more information Contact Stephany Jackson or Tammy Wiens or call (888) 728-7228, x8488 or x5496.

 
     
   
   
 

 

 
  g  
  Terms of Use: Presbyterians Today grants one-time-only permission for individual use or to churches and other not-for-profit entities to reprint articles (maximum 100 copies). Must be distributed free of charge. No resale permitted. Reprints to be used for educational purposes only. Send an email to request permission to copy or reprint material for congregational use.
 
 
   
  For more information contact Presbyterians Today, 100 Witherspoon Street, Louisville, KY 40202, (888) 728-7228, x5637 or FAX (502) 569-8632, or send email.  
  Send an email to Presbyterians Today.  
   
 

 
   

http://www.pcusa.org/today/believe/2008/elders.htm

February 14, 2008

PC(USA) High Court Rules “Fidelity and Chastity” Standard Remains Binding

Filed under: Leadership, PCUSA, PFR, Polity, Reformed — rexespiritu @ 2:44 pm
http://www.ga2008.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=55&Itemid=5 

PC(USA) High Court Rules “Fidelity and Chastity” Standard Remains Binding

Print
Written by Presbyterians For Renewal   
Wednesday, 13 February 2008
Tuesday, February 12, 2008,  the PC(USA)’s highest court issued a landmark decision that has direct bearing on the intense debate over ordination standards in the PC(USA).  For the last twenty months, a confusing debate has raged over the meaning of a new “authoritative interpretation” (AI) of the constitution passed by the 2006 General Assembly.  Indeed, congregations have left the PC(USA) in recent months, citing this new AI as a primary cause.  The new AI appeared as though it would allow sessions and presbyteries to ordain candidates who were in open violation of our denomination’s constitutional standards for ordination, including the biblical “Fidelity and Chastity” standard. In addition, just last month two presbyteries cited this new AI as justification for their decisions to allow open departures from the “Fidelity and Chastity” standard. 

However, in three decisions just issued, the General Assembly Permanent Judicial Commission (GAPJC) has ruled that no ordaining body (session or presbytery) has the right to ordain a candidate who is in violation of constitutional standards, including the “Fidelity and Chastity” standard expressed in the Book of Order (G-6.0106b).  With these new GAPJC rulings, we can now rest assured that our standards for ordination in the PC(USA) continue to reflect the clear teaching of Scripture and the plain meaning of our constitution. 

The authoritative interpretation passed by the General Assembly in 2006 had been recommended by the Peace, Unity and Purity Task Force, and it interpreted section G-6.0108 of the Book of Order, which concerns the “freedom of conscience” of church officers.  Many believed that this new AI was intended to extend the “freedom” of officers to the point of being “free” to set aside the clear standards established by the whole church and expressed in the Book of Order.  Special interest organizations in the PC(USA) whose mission is to move the PC(USA) toward embracing the ordination of self-affirming, practicing homosexual persons “celebrated” the proposal. PFR and many others in the denomination expressed deep concern over the ambiguous proposal and the impact it might have on the church — certainly bringing confusion and potentially changing the binding character of the denomination’s ordination standards. Since an amended version of the AI was passed by a narrow margin at the G.A. in 2006, the church has been embroiled in debate over what, if anything, had changed.  

These recent GAPJC rulings clarify that nothing has changed. According to the GAPJC: “The freedom of conscience granted in G-6.0108 allows candidates to express disagreement with the wording or meaning of provisions of the constitution, but does not permit disobedience to those behavioral standards.”  And it continues by stating that the “fidelity and chastity provision may only be changed by a constitutional amendment. Until that occurs, individual candidates, officers, examining and governing bodies must adhere to it.”

PFR believes these GAPJC rulings promote the peace, unity and purity of the church:

First, the GAPJC rulings promote the peace of the church.  Over the last two years, debate over the meaning of the new AI has embroiled the church in deep controversy that has not been honoring to Jesus Christ. The new AI has been testimony to the fact that ambiguous legislation promotes discord.  While debate over ordination standards will continue, the GAPJC rulings restore clarity to the constitution and bring to an end a particularly divisive chapter in our denomination’s debate on this issue.

Second, these rulings promote the unity of the church.  The GAPJC rulings make it clear that all governing bodies of the PC(USA) must adhere to the standards established by the whole church and expressed in the constitution.  In other words, the PC(USA) is still one body that follows one set of clear standards for its officers. The PC(USA)’s constitution is intended to be both an expression of the church’s unity and an important means of maintaining that unity. If individual governing bodies within the PC(USA) were permitted to set aside national standards, the unity of the church would be severely compromised. These rulings by the GAPJC make clear that all governing bodies of the PC(USA) are called to function within the boundaries of the one, larger covenant community. Furthermore, by clearly stating that the constitutional amendment process is the only way to change the standards of the church, the GAPJC rulings ensure that the voice of the whole church (expressed through both the G.A. and the presbyteries) will continue to set the standards of our denomination.

Third, the rulings promote the purity of the church. The GAPJC makes it clear that the “Fidelity and Chastity” standard (G-6.0106b), which requires sexual purity of church officers, remains a mandatory provision of the constitution . This standard reflects both the clear teaching of Scripture and the mind of the church.  It is one important way in which church officers are called to live as faithful witnesses to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. In the midst of a culture that is confused about God’s design for humanity sexuality, it is particularly important for the church to speak with one clear voice on this issue and for its ministers, elders and deacons to maintain moral integrity.

PFR continues to be grateful to God for our calling to serve in that part of the Body of Christ called the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). And we continue to urge our denomination to engage in a season of prayer and fasting in preparation for the upcoming General Assembly in June and for our ongoing witness to the transforming power of Jesus Christ.

http://www.ga2008.com/index2.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=55&pop=1&page=0&Itemid=5

http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001SbrvdaYU6ovrqgFZL4gGounOhCrQybty88e24dGbaP11wvmQUZKvZy8qYZw4ZwHFiBQwkUWgZVV1ZC3KOXoJuiVWBbCMJcSTPhdUFCMS8L2hSgf457PwpzJEvTJ54rWgFCfKZq6XWjKLNk0sEaZWeb0-T1m3b3dt7FUjVXFBn-sYPWosyCYmsCuCVUDfalPpldgBDCahjD0=

April 6, 2007

Examining our life together

Filed under: Leadership, Missional, PCUSA, PGF, Polity, Reformed — rexespiritu @ 4:48 am
Examining our life together
In 1910, the United Presbyterian Church in North American formally adopted a set of mission statements that was intended to define its life and work. Called the “Six Great Ends of the Church,” these brief phrases attempted to draw together elements of belief and practice that could be traced throughout our own confessional history to the very teachings of Jesus himself. Nearly one hundred years and two denominational mergers later, these statements remain in the Constitution of the PC(USA), and they appear in the opening pages of the Book of Order

  • The proclamation of the gospel for the salvation of humankind
  • The shelter, nurture, and spiritual fellowship of the children of God
  • The maintenance of divine worship 
  • The preservation of the truth 
  • The promotion of social righteousness 
  • The exhibition of the Kingdom of Heaven to the world

While the whole of the plan and purpose of God can never be reduced to a short list, statements like this are useful tools in helping us to evaluate the overall health of our churches. There have been other markers of health used over the years.

Church historian George Marsden, for example, observes that healthy churches throughout history always have at least three characteristics. They are confessional (they know what they believe); they are conversional (there is a lively, transformational experience of Jesus); and they are missional (they keep their face turned toward the world). Marsden says that churches will eventually go “into the ditch” if one or more of these is missing.

We should also confront the challenge of what some have called the “3-fold priority of the Christian life”: Growing more in love with [the Triune] God—growing more in love with the Body of Christ—and growing more in love with the work of Christ in the world.

There are common elements of each of these statements regarding our life as a community of faith. Each helps us to think afresh about our identity, our purpose and our activity. Each is centered in the work of God, includes a focus on the care and nurture of one another, and has a missional emphasis.

We should not forget that the Great Ends begins with proclamation and ends with exhibition. It embraces both the Gospel “about” Jesus, which is centered in his life, death, resurrection and ascension on behalf of all humankind, and the Gospel “of” Jesus, which focuses on his own preaching of the Kingdom and his call that others join him in the life of that Kingdom beginning now and continuing through eternity.

As we look at our life as God’s people in light of these simple statements, what do we see? Our churches seem to be better at sheltering, nurturing, maintaining and preserving, than in proclaiming, promoting, and exhibiting. Our churches often emphasize being confessional (how we think about faith), but give less time to true transformation or mission. Our churches are often more known for our love of God and perhaps each other, than for our love of Christ’s work in the world. Just look at how we spend our resources.

We do well from time to time to take a look at how we are doing as communities of faith in light of some simple criteria derived from Scripture which articulates the marks of healthy church life.

We might also back up and ask such questions as: 1) What is God doing in the world? 2) What is God’s purpose for the church in the world? 3) How can we align ourselves with the purposes and activity of God?

Adapted from the » e-Newsletter August 1, 2006 of the Presbyterian Global Fellowship  http://PresbyterianGlobalFellowship.org/eNewsletters.aspx 

February 19, 2007

Never Content

Filed under: Missional, PCUSA, Reformed — rexespiritu @ 3:17 am

In a posting dated January 24, 2007 from The Outbox of the Presbyterian Global Fellowship, Clark Cowden writes about being…. 

Never Content

The Book of Order is part II of the constitution of the Presbyterian Church (USA).  Over the years, the character of the book has become much more regulatory in nature, but there are still some really important statements that can help direct our congregations in a much more missional direction.  One example is found in the Form of Government section G-4.0201 which says this:

“The unity of the Church is a gift of its Lord and finds expression in its faithfulness to the mission to which Christ calls it.  The church is a fellowship of believers which seeks the enlargement of the circle of faith to include all people and is never content to enjoy the benefits of Christian community for itself alone.”

How does this statement reflect the reality in your congregation?  Would the people in your congregation agree with this statement or not?  If they agree with it, do they live, act, and behave this way?   Read more…

February 13, 2007

On the Congregation and Ecclesiology

Filed under: Missional, Reformed — rexespiritu @ 4:55 pm

January 28The congregation is the basic locale for telling and celebrating the Christian story.  Here is the place where, in season and out, the Word is preached and the sacraments administered, and by the grace of God, rightly so.  For all its manifest flaws, this assembly is the basic bearer of the promises of God to this people of God. — Gabriel Fackre, “The Congregation and the Unity of the Church

January 29The church is God’s institution; it makes us, we do not make it. — Ellen Charry, “Sacramental Ecclesiology

(The church is the body of Christ in and through which God makes, molds, and shapes us for God’s glory and our good.  By the grace of God, we are [trans]formed and renewed by the Word and Spirit of Christ proclaimed in and through the church.  –Rex Espiritu) 

…the center of the [emerging/emergent theological] movement is about [missional] ecclesiology not epistemology.  …the emerging [missional] church movement …is a definite threat to [what has been the] traditional [praxis of] evangelical ecclesiology.  The central element of this missional praxis is that the emerging movement is not attractional in its model of the church but is instead missional: that is, it does not invite people to church but instead wanders into the world as the church. It asks its community “How can we help you?” instead of knocking on doors to increase membership. In other words, it becomes a community with open windows and open doors and sees Sunday morning as the opportunity to prepare for a week of service to the community, asking not how many are attending the services but what redemptive traits are we seeing in our community. It wants to embody a life that is other-oriented rather than self-oriented, that is community-directed rather than church-oriented.  What is the Emerging Church?” (p. 7, 9-10, 21) by Scot McKnight, delivered during a conference in October 26-27, 2006 at Westminster Theological Seminary

Blog at WordPress.com.